A W A R D S 1 9 9 9 |
|||||||||||||
B E S T B A Y A R E A A R T I S T S ' P O R T F O L I O |
|||||||||||||
The WINNERS The JURORS The SUBMISSIONS The COMMENTS Awards MANAGER |
|||||||||||||
THE ARTISTS WHO WON:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Our heartfelt thanks go to our Jurors who spent many hours visiting the submitted sites, suffering through long downloads and numerous crashes. They put a lot of thought into their choices and made specific, helpful comments, from which we've taken the sample below. We hope that these comments will help our artists improve their portfolios and promote their work. |
|||||||||||||
| Alan
Bamberger creative consultant; columnist, American Artist ArtBusiness.com
Johnny Davis
Arabella Decker
Li Gardiner
|
Cay
Lang artist; creative coach; author of Taking the Leap Taking the Leap
Tony Reveaux
Yarrow Summers
Sarah Vinci
|
||||||||||||
Natasha Epperson is a true heroine. She maintained the Submissions and Jurors pages, created the Submissions form and Jurors forms, and tallied over 600 separate scores with a database. She checked and re-checked the scores between 36-hour shifts as an Emergency Medical Technician and managing her exploding photography business. "I've lived and breathed drawing and anything else artistic since I could pick up a marking implement or figure a way to create with my hands -- illustrations, wood working, print making, sign painting, photography. . . Right now I make my living as an ambulance paramedic, and use my art as an outlet and hobby. I live with my husband of 4 years, and 4 cats: Misty, Tori and Oscar and Phelix." Our sincere thanks go to Natasha and her husband Charles. |
|||||||||||||
| "The small thumbnails were
beautiful, but the enlargements were disappointing -- ragged and low-resolution.
No info about each piece, no prices, media, not even a title! This brought
down the overall score."
"This site was simple, with subdued colors and small text, but very elegant. The images of the art work had exceptional color and resolution, and yet downloads were surprisingly fast! Fantastic imagery and quality of work. Unfortunately no prices or other purchasing/commission info." "The images of the work were too ragged and low-res. And there was no information about the artist at all." "On the front page, the bad-looking white edges on the transparent GIFs were a turn-off. However, interior images were detailed and intriguing. The text of the artist's statement was too large and yellow, and filled the entire right frame no matter what piece I chose. It became monotonous and detracted from the work." "This site crashed Netscape twice. Very bad! Will not return." "This artist's pages were part of a large organization's site. While the site design was very clean and functional, it didn't reflect any artistic individuality, nor was enough work shown."
|
"Great Flash animation and
sound. Really nice typography and attention to design. Very professional
presentation. But no info about services or description of
work/client/projects/media."
"The person who submitted the site has only a small amount of work on the site . But the artist's partner did the bulk of the art work. This was too confusing." "Very interesting group site. But it's unclear whether the artist and the organization are the same. Unclear whether this constitutes an online portfolio for the artist or whether the work comes from a group, since there was no info about each piece." "The only way to get to any page was to go back to the home page each time. This artist got zero for navigation." "This site was simple, attractive, lean. Extremely easy to navigate. Rough, textural art work with beautiful color. Beautiful presentation." "It took WAY too many clicks and page downloads to find the art thumbnails, about four levels in, and then there were no enlargements available anyway. What a disappointment." "Overall, I found it an interesting experiment and I look forward to seeing the results, as well as the next incarnation!"
|
||||||||||||